Simply said
the simplification centre's blog
A piece of ceremonial
I recently received - and I expect you did too - a leaflet from my bank entitled
Important changes to your credit card terms and conditions.
Three closely spaced but neatly laid out pages told me about a range of new and changed conditions that apply to my credit card. These are required by compliance with UK and EU regulations. The bank thinks these are so important that it tells me it is
Important information - please read this carefully
Well I did. I have to say that after about half a page of type, rather on the small side, in lines, rather on the long side, I was beginning to wonder why it was so important.
Finally, near the bottom of the second page, I came to this:
Making your terms clearer
We've also taken this opportunity to make some of our conditions clearer for you. Please take the time to read the following conditions: 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 6, 7, 8, 9.2, 9.3, 9.5, 10.3 (previously 10.4), 11.2, 12.1, 12.2, 12.4, (previously 12.3), 13.4 (previously 13.3), 13.6, 14.1, 14.4, 14.6, 16.1, 19.10 (previously 18.7), and 19.12 (previously 18.8).
I should have mentioned that neither the new nor the old conditions were enclosed but I could get them by calling customer services or consulting the relevant page of the bank's website.
Perhaps somewhere there is a world where normal bank customers will indeed send for and then read all these important conditions; but it is not the world in which you or I or indeed the authors of the leaflet live. Or would want to live.
So what is happening here?
Politicians, regulators and financial services company employees are through the best of motives conspiring to create a nonsense. Politicians want the companies to be open and clear to customers. Regulators have to turn that into something that can be regulated - in court if necessary. And companies want to defend themselves against penalties for non-compliance.
Walter Bagehot famously explained that the British constitution was divided into the dignified and the efficient parts. Leaflets like this are part of the dignified ceremonial of consumer protection. We mustn't kid ourselves that they have an effective function.
-
A panel of non-experts
A panel of non-experts The Centre is recruiting a wide range of typical users to help test documents and websites for ease of use. -
Parliament waves big stick (and laughs) at Government's language
The Public Administration Select Committee publishes its report on official language. -
Common sense about parking
The Traffic Penalty Tribunal makes some important general points about government communications with the citizen -
Testing, testing
A debate has broken out in the pages of Design Week, a magazine for professional designers, about user-testing... -
A piece of ceremonial
Some unrealistic assumptions about what customers will read -
IKEA - we see things differently
The instructions may confuse - even before you get to the store -
No Logo
The Electoral Commission has researched the impact of ballot paper design on voters' choices -
Good passives
Using the active rather than the passive sometimes has a price -
Stay happy: satisfice!
Why we're (rightly) not rational consumers. -
On the road again
A successful round of document roadshows reveals some common themes.

Leave a comment